Editorial
Higher Education
Lutheran Identity

From the Editor

Intersections No. 13 · Winter 2002

This issue of Intersections was fun to put together because of the diversity of pieces that it contains. It includes Darrel Jodock’s inaugural lecture as he assumed the Bernhardson chair at Gustavus Adolphus College. His lecture raises for me the question, “What would a religious tradition be like that had no sense of humor?” I’m sure that such exist, but I’m very happy to say that I do not personally know them. I had a returning student (I think she was in her mid-fifties) in a class a few years ago. One day I discovered that the traditional aged students in the class referred to her among themselves as “the church lady from hell.” She condemned everyone she encountered in that class: the authors of the texts, me, her fellow students. She went on to point out in detail what was wrong with our views, prefacing each sentence with the words, “God and I think….” When I challenged her condemnations she said, “Don’t you believe in the absoluteness of God?” I said I did, and that this was why I did not consider any human version of the truth as absolute. Not hers, not even my own. When I told her that Luther referred to his own theology as “a bag of farts,” she was not amused. Sad.

Ernie Simmons’ article follows. This was a talk he gave at last summer’s Vocation of a Lutheran College Conference which I thought would be of interest to faculty at all our institutions because it researches so thoroughly what our current crop of students are like and what the difficulties and opportunities are that they present to us. This is followed by two short pieces that came out of a travel-study opportunity for faculty and students in South Africa. These pieces by Brian Wallace and Corin Wesner demonstrate what a soul-opening opportunity such cultural relocation can occasion. I thought it made very good sense to publish them together with some of the photographs they brought back. Finally there are two reviews of important books that came out this year. I was very happy to review Richard Hughes’ book. I had heard him deliver some of it’s chapters as public addresses and wanted to see how he fit them together into a larger argument. Joy Schroeder’s review of Robert Benne’s book concludes this issue. It is a book that deserves a discussion on each of our campuses.

If any of you are interested in reviewing books for future issues please let me know.

Tom Christenson
Capital University

Share this article