Editorial
Higher Education
Lutheran Identity
Vocation

From the Publisher

Intersections No. 31 · Winter 2010

I became a fan of the Lutheran doctrine of vocation decades ago. It happened while I was a first year student (we were still freshmen back then) at St. Olaf in conversations stemming from reading An Open Letter to the German Nobility in the old Dillenberger collection of Luther’s treatises of 1520. In the intervening decades, educational leaders have deeply embraced the concept and rhetoric of vocation. For example, Parker Palmer has made his living for twenty years by traveling the lecture circuit, frequently addressing groups of educators on the theme of vocation. Private higher education has been an avid participant in the larger conversation about vocation. References to the theme appear repeatedly. A recent example is a reference in a Chronicle of Higher Education (January 29, 2010, page B8) essay about the Mark C. Taylor, the highly regarded professor of religion at Columbia University, who has written (in Field Notes from Elsewhere: Reflections on Dying and Living) that he has struggled with coming to terms with “the meaning of vocation in his life and his career—what it means to receive something like a religious calling when you in fact ‘don’t believe in the one who calls.’”

Since the Lutheran church’s theological tradition is a primary source for the current conversations in the USA about vocation, some leaders in Lutheran higher education (including myself) believe all ELCA-related colleges and universities should claim vocation as the defining mark of a school rooted in the Lutheran tradition. Embracing this doctrine provides an answer to the neuralgic question, “How can a college be Lutheran if it is no longer a college where all the Lutherans are?” Persons of good will from any background can join Lutherans and our institutions in education for vocation even if, like Mark Taylor, they cannot join with Lutherans (and other Christians) in believing that God in Jesus Christ is the one who calls us.

There is, however, no consensus about naming “education for vocation” as the defining mark of Lutheran higher education. The articles in this issue of Intersections reflect the widespread engagement with the theme of vocation by ELCA colleges and universities. The standing, annual “Vocation of a Lutheran College” conference further testifies to emphasis that the theme of vocation receives in our community, and a special conference this fall will explore the many programs (Lilly Endowment-supported and others) on education for vocation. Yet I fear that “vocation” remains for many merely the higher education program du jour instead of a permanent and enlivening hallmark of Lutheran higher education. All ELCA colleges and universities have received invitations to participate in the special fall conference, October 31-November 2 at Augsburg College in Minneapolis. I hope the event helps move us further along the way from du jour to hallmark!

Share this article