I must start off by saying that I am not Indigenous and living in the U.S. I experience privilege from being white. I am from Ferndale, Washington, and grew up on unceded land that has been the Lummi Nation’s since time immemorial.
I had long prioritized social justice in my life, from advocacy for local education initiatives to leading young voter sign ups to promoting resources for women’s reproductive health — long before Lutheran higher Ed took me into its (loving) grasp. That being said, growing up the granddaughter of a Lutheran pastor, I’m sure the tenets of Lutheranism played a role from the start.
When I took a class called “Indigenous Rights and Practices” during my junior year at California Lutheran University, I anticipated interest in the subject but did not predict the profound impact it would have on me. The class allowed me to have conversations that changed my world view and shifted how I perceived my obligation towards the land I grew up on. I gained knowledge about the political landscape surrounding tribes in the U.S. in a way I had not previously experienced. Most importantly, I took away an identity as a “treaty partner.”
My work in the class focused on the Treaty of Point Elliott of 1855. The Treaty of Point Elliott was signed by numerous Coast Salish tribes, as well as the future first governor of the Washington territory, Isaac Stevens. The Treaty made many promises — guaranteeing healthcare, opportunities for education, and the maintenance of tribes’ traditional fishing rights. However, not unlike every other treaty the U.S. has signed with a tribe, this treaty has been broken time and time again. Let me repeat that so it sticks with you — every treaty a tribe has signed with the U.S. has been broken. 368 broken promises.
As a part of the project, I interviewed a former Chairman of the Lummi Nation, and we had a conversation about the inextricable nature of the Treaty: salmon, land, orcas, and people. During the conversation about the Treaty, the Chairman emphasized repeatedly that I am a treaty partner. He said too often treaties are thought of as just “Indigenous things” and “relics of the past.” He underscored the constitutional obligation to understand treaties as the supreme law of the land. The Chairman urged me to understand that the Treaty of Point Elliott is just as much my treaty, as it is his.
The U.S. Government has broken their promises, and many of us have looked the other direction while they have done so.
The U.S. government, largely comprised of white, protestant, heterosexual, wealthy men, have incessantly put the full onus on tribes to uphold and fight for what was promised in jointly signed treaties. A treaty at its core is a promise; it is a partnership. Promises require commitment to be upheld from all sides, and when a party is not a good-faith partner, treaties do not function, and one of the partners loses recognition in the process. The U.S. Government has broken their promises, and many of us have looked the other direction while they have done so. They have stolen land, killed animals, kidnapped children, and purposefully eradicated the languages and cultures that have sustained Indigenous people since time immemorial in immeasurable ways, an unquantifiable number of times.
As a country, our conversations with Indigenous nations, our government-to-government partners, have long been riddled with white people speaking over Indigenous voices and failing to honor formal treaties. These conversations have come with a disregard for differing opinions, and ears shut to cries that demand access to land, clean water, and healthcare. We have a duty to uphold our treaties — that in and of itself is public interest and civic engagement. When we do not do so, we disregard our government partners, our neighbors, and our friends.
My understanding of myself as a treaty partner has led to me sharing this perspective. While I fully accredit the language and knowledge of being a treaty partner to the Chairman, I have California Lutheran to thank for giving me the steppingstone to uncover this identity that should have been there all along.
I have pursued opportunities to delve further into the idea of being a treaty partner, focusing my undergraduate philosophy capstone on Indigenous sovereignty and U.S. treaty breaches, by comparing arguments made by John Locke and Vine Deloria Jr., a Standing Rock Sioux theologian, author, and Indigenous activist. I have used my position as a U.S. Senate staffer to advocate on behalf of tribes. I am now applying to law school to continue to grow in this treaty partner identity in a new way.
I challenge you to identify and understand the treaties that affect the land of your home. I aim to stir a curiosity in you to learn about the promises that impact places and living things dear to you.
I am a treaty partner because my ancestors signed the Treaty of Point Elliott and I have benefited immeasurably from it. The treaty is full of flaws and problematic promises, items that scream colonization and assumptions of misplaced authority and superiority. But it also reserves rights and guarantees vaccines and education. I have a responsibility to uphold the treaty and respect it as the supreme law of the land. I challenge you to identify and understand the treaties that affect the land of your home. I aim to stir a curiosity in you to learn about the promises that impact places and living things dear to you.
I know I have failed and will continue to fail in upholding my treaty. However, a much more significant failure would be declining to acknowledge, share, and fight for the promises stated in the Treaty of Point Elliott altogether. Sharing the verbiage of being a treaty partner, is a step I am taking as I walk on, practicing ownership and responsibility.
-
Editorial
From the Publisher & Editor
Colleen Windham-Hughes, Lamont Anthony Wells
6 min audio
Wells and Windham-Hughes frame vocation as “ground game” — the practical, public living-out of faith through civic engagement — and introduce the issue’s focus on how Lutheran higher education equips students to repair the world.
-
Article
Civic Engagement and Faith Perspectives
William O'Brochta
15 min audio
Guest editor William O’Brochta introduces the section by overviewing the ELCA’s call to civic engagement, recapping the Fall 2025 Civic Engagement and Faith Perspectives conference at Texas Lutheran University, and previewing the participant essays that follow.
-
Article
Leaning-In to the Civic Lessons of Our Namesakes
A. Lanethea Mathews-Schultz
6 min audio
Mathews-Schultz uses the civic legacy of the Muhlenberg family — from General Pete’s Revolutionary call to action to President Muhlenberg’s inaugural address on the “education of conscience” — to invite students at Muhlenberg College into a shared civic inheritance.
-
Article
Teaching and Mentoring in Service of Civic Engagement
Haco Hoang
6 min audio
Hoang describes how her teaching, mentoring, and research at California Lutheran University — including a multi-year collaboration with the Lutheran Office of Public Policy on Lutheran Lobby Day — cultivate civic skills grounded in ELCA social statements and the Lutheran tradition of faith and reason.
-
Article
Community-Based Research as Engaged Citizenship
James Paul Old
6 min audio
Old argues that genuine citizenship requires more than charitable gestures — it demands long-term, reciprocal community partnerships — and describes how Valparaiso’s Community Research and Service Center embodies that vision even amid the financial pressures threatening such programs.
-
Article
An Ecosystem of Democracy
David Thomason
6 min audio
Thomason argues that faith-based institutions should equip students not to dominate the public sphere with their convictions but to cultivate an “ecosystem of democracy” — pursuing universal values with virtue and tolerance while acknowledging humanity’s incomplete grasp of truth.
-
Article
Bringing Core Values to Life through Civic Engagement
Austin Trantham
5 min audio
Trantham shows how Saint Leo University’s Benedictine Core Values shape his civic engagement work — from advising a “Why Vote?” campaign and Constitution Day panels to engaging students in the Unify Challenge for respectful cross-institutional discourse.
-
Article
Civic Engagement, "Baylor In Deeds," and Engaged Learning
Rebecca Flavin
6 min audio
Flavin describes how Baylor’s strategic plan “Baylor in Deeds” and its Office of Engaged Learning are building civic engagement into the Arts & Sciences core curriculum, with early Global Engagement Survey data showing gains in civic efficacy and global civic responsibility.
-
Article
Fragmented in Faith: The Concerns and Hopes Found in Student Spirituality and Civic Engagement
Emma Bohmann, Monica Sitachitta
11 min audio
Two Texas Lutheran University students reflect on the cyclical pattern of low spiritual and civic engagement on their campus and argue that distinguishing Lutheran values from Lutheran practice could open space for civic engagement to become a non-optional expression of neighbor-justice for all students.
-
Response
Of Imaginary Cows and a White Toy Sheep: The Freedom of a Christian College
Ryan La Hurd
No. 6 · Winter 1999
La Hurd, president of Lenoir-Rhyne and a former Thiel English professor and Augsburg academic dean, responds to Christenson by insisting (with Robert Kegan’s story of Tommy’s imaginary cattle farm) that a college is composed of people but is not itself a person, and so cannot share in Luther’s freedom of the Christian. Drawing on Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities, Lewis Hyde’s The Gift, George Marsden, Mark Schwehn, Jacques Barzun, and the Pew Higher Education Roundtable, he distinguishes the “imagined college” (the gift-economy realm of teaching and the alma mater) from the “real college” (the commodity-economy realm of fund-raising, deferred maintenance, and federal aid reconciliation that does not have such freedom)—and ends with Pablo Neruda’s “Childhood and Poetry” and the marvelous white toy sheep offered through a hole in a fence.
-
Institutional Focus
Building a Developmental Framework for Vocational Reflection at Thiel College
Brian Riddle, Greg Q. Butcher, Liza Anne Schaef
No. 55 · Spring 2022
Riddle, Schaef, and Butcher describe how a NetVUE Program Development Grant enabled Thiel College to build “the Tomcat Way” — a four-year developmental framework with personal, social, academic, and professional domains and four phases (Explore, Envision, Belong and Lead, Launch) — that now guides every aspect of the student experience.
-
Article
Rich and Poor in an Era of Globalized Religion and Economies: Challenges to Lutheran Colleges
Pamela K. Brubaker
No. 25 · Spring 2007
Brubaker opens with two World Council of Churches communion stories—a generous Aymara potato meal in Bolivia and a gated invitation-only lunch at a prosperous immigrant German Lutheran church in Brazil—to frame the question of which stance Lutheran colleges will adopt toward diversity. Drawing on Richard Hughes and Ernest Simmons on Lutheran “ecumenical confessionalism,” Linell Cady, Ulrich Beck, Held and McGrew, the World Bank’s 2006 Equity and Development report, Mark Juergensmeyer’s Global Religions, Harvey Cox on the Market as God, the WCC’s “economy of life” / AGAPE document, and Larry Rasmussen on universal human rights, she argues that part of the academic work of Lutheran colleges is to educate for critical citizenship by questioning neo-liberal assumptions and equipping students to claim social, economic, cultural, civil, and political rights for the whole human family.
-
Response
Hitting a Moving Target
Harry Jebsen
No. 3 · Summer 1997
Jebsen, former Provost of Capital University, responds to Reichenbach by arguing that the institutions, the ELCA, congregations and pastors, students, and curriculum are all moving targets. Drawing on Alvin Toffler’s Future Shock and his own fifteen years of hiring as Dean and Provost (a candidate who hoped the cross out front didn’t mean anything), he traces the drift from the “Mr. Chips” faculty who personified Dana and Midland Lutheran to a campus culture where “everybody is nice to each other” has replaced theological substance, and where MBA programs, conservatories, law schools, and adult-education programs further dilute the focus of the residential Lutheran college.
-
Article
Building on a Firm Foundation: ELCA Inter-Religious Relations
Kathryn M. Lohre
No. 40 · Fall 2014
Lohre traces the ELCA’s twenty-year arc of inter-religious work — from the 1994 Declaration to the Jewish Community and the Lutheran-Jewish Consultative Panel, through the post-9/11 Lutheran-Muslim Panel and the Shoulder to Shoulder Campaign, to fledgling dialogue with Sikhs and the dharmic traditions — and frames Lutheran inter-religious engagement as the strengthening, not the dilution, of Lutheran vocation.
-
Article
An Apostolate of Hope
David L. Tiede
No. 32 · Spring 2010
Tiede argues that the vocation of a Lutheran college is to be “an apostolate of hope” oriented by three metrics of our time: 12,000 (the Dow), 350 (parts per million of CO2), and $1.25 (the daily income of 1.4 billion people in extreme poverty). Drawing on Darrell Jodock’s “third path” for church-related colleges, Larry Rasmussen’s Batalden lectures, Mark Tranvik, Douglas John Hall, Bill McKibben, Stephen Privett, Peter Singer, and Augsburg’s Center for Global Education, he proposes that justification by faith, critical pluralism, stewardship of God’s earth, and love and justice for our students together prepare wise leaders to renew the future.