Affirming, Entrusting, and Acting: A Baptismal Grounding of Affirmative Action in Lutheran Higher Education
Intersections No. 60 · Fall 2024
“How do you define affirmative action in the context of Lutheran (NECU) higher education, and what are its main objectives?”
This provocative question was asked to those of us who attended this past summer’s Vocation of Lutheran Higher Education Conference at Augsburg University after a panel discussion on our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion at institutions of the Network of ELCA Colleges and Universities (NECU).
We were asked to respond to this question while gathered in small groups with colleagues who occupy similar positions at other NECU institutions.
When this question came up on the screen, it immediately stimulated my imagination.
I thought perhaps, as the whitest Christian denomination in North America, institutions of the ELCA had little to say about the practice of affirmative action in our society.
As institutions grounded by the vision presented in “Rooted and Open: The Common Calling of the Network of ELCA Colleges and Universities,” I began to imagine how it was that Lutheran theology and practice might support and affirm the ways our institutions strive to create spaces for all students, particularly for those who come from under-represented populations on our campuses.
To this end, I asked myself, “Where in the shared practice of Lutheran communities do we make affirmations and where do we take action?”
As a Lutheran pastor, I immediately thought of the sacrament of baptism because it is through baptism that individuals are welcomed and incorporated into the community of the church.
Baptism is a sign of radical welcome into a community, where the baptized now unconditionally belong.
To do this, the Lutheran baptism liturgy includes a moment where the pastor presiding over the baptism asks the entire gathered assembly to make a profession of their faith.
“Where in the shared practice of Lutheran communities do we make affirmations and where do we take action?”
In this profession of faith, the pastor asks the assembly a series of six questions. The first three ask the gathered assembly to renounce ways of the world that defy God’s desire for humanity and creation, including evil and sin. The second three ask the assembly what they believe, using the words of the Apostles’s Creed to affirm faith.
The assembly is ritually asked what they say “no” to and what they say “yes” to. In their responses, they make affirmative statements about the content of their belief.1
Earlier in the liturgy, the presiding minister lists the responsibilities that are entrusted to those who are baptized, concluding with the effect these responsibilities have on the baptized, namely “so that [they] may learn to trust God, proclaim Christ through word and deed, care for others and the world God made, and work for justice and peace.”2
In the sacrament, the act of affirming belief entrusts the baptized with responsibilities, through which they are called to action in the world.
Action that promotes care, justice, and peace in our world.
As all these thoughts swirled in my head, I shared some of these initial ideas with colleagues at the conference. Speaking together, they helped me articulate a connection between my thinking and our shared work. Because similar to the way the gathered assembly affirms what they are for in the baptismal liturgy, our colleges and universities are also called to affirm what it is that we are for.
“Because similar to the way the gathered assembly affirms what they are for in the baptismal liturgy, our colleges and universities are also called to affirm what it is that we are for.”
In “Rooted and Open,” the authors affirm that “In their appreciation and cultivation of diversity in its many forms, Lutheran colleges and universities welcome all and learn from all.”3
This is an affirmation echoed by many of our schools in mission statements and college or university values. At my own school, St. Olaf College, our mission statement specifically names that we strive for our students to learn in an “inclusive, globally engaged community.”4
In this mission, we make an affirmative statement about the community of which we are a part.
“As the sacrament of baptism reminds us, our affirmations also entrust us with responsibilities, which move us towards action in our communities and the world.”
But, as the sacrament of baptism reminds us, our affirmations also entrust us with responsibilities, which move us towards action in our communities and the world.
The questions for our communities, then, are: What responsibilities do our affirmations to create diverse, inclusive communities create for us? And what actions do our responsibilities call us towards?
A Lutheran perspective on affirmative action argues that we will create truly inclusive and just communities when we clearly affirm our commitments, name the responsibilities that our affirmation entrusts to us, and act in ways that embody our affirmations.
May our work be grounded in such affirmations, responsibilities, and actions that we continue to move our communities to be places of belonging so that all our students may flourish.
Endnotes
1. “Holy Baptism,” in Evangelical Lutheran Worship (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 2006), 229.
2. Ibid, 228
3. “Rooted and Open,” May 18, 2018, https://elcamediaresources.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/wp-content/uploads/Rooted_and_Open.pdf.
4. “Mission,” About St. Olaf, June 7, 2023, https://wp.stolaf.edu/about/mission/.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Colleen Windham-Hughes
Windham-Hughes welcomes newcomers and seasoned colleagues to the conversation, lifts up Mary Elise Lowe’s three Lutheran “whys” for educational access, and commends Rev. Jen Rude’s “Sacred Pause” practice as a way to humanize one another and make opening access both easier and more joyful.
-
Editorial
From the Publisher: Reflections on the 2024 Vocational Leaders in Higher Education Conference
Lamont Anthony Wells
Wells reflects on the 2024 VLHE Conference theme — “Educational Access: Lutheran Roots, Contemporary Practices” — tracing today’s commitment to inclusivity back to Martin Luther’s radical 16th-century insistence that both boys and girls be educated, and previews NECU’s expanded engagement of student leaders alongside faculty and administrators.
-
Article
Access, Accessibility, & Change: A Call for Trustworthy Leadership in Higher Education
Emma Jones
Jones surveys the converging pressures on higher education — cost, the enrollment cliff, shifting demographics, and declining public confidence — and uses Reichheld and Dunlap’s four factors of trust (transparency, capability, reliability, humanity) to call campus leaders to rebuild trustworthy leadership from the inside out.
-
Article
Creation, Justice, and Communio: Lutheran Insights Empowering Educational Access
Mary Elise Lowe
In her VLHE keynote, Lowe names three Lutheran commitments — continuing creation, neighbor justice, and communio — as the “why” that empowers ELCA colleges and universities to pursue equitable access for students often left behind by persistence and graduation gaps.
-
Article
Committed to Paradox
Caryn Riswold
Riswold lifts up paradox — saint and sinner, lord and servant, Rooted and Open — as a distinctive Lutheran root that lets institutions honor the complicated truth of who their students are and embrace the messy, ever-reforming work of access and accessibility as a theology of the cross.
-
Article
2024 VHLE Conference: "Rooting Access" Panel Talking Points
Guy Nave
Nave reads “access” across Deuteronomy 23, Ruth, Isaiah 56, Acts 10, and Matthew 15:21-28 as an ongoing biblical conversation that evolves from exclusion to ever-widening welcome — and presses ELCA institutions to shift their focus from “student readiness” to “institutional readiness.”
-
Reflection
Reflecting on Belonging
Melissa Woeppel
Woeppel, campus pastor at her own alma mater, wrestles with a Bethany student’s plea — “I want to feel like this is my home, like I belong” — and Mindy Makant’s reminder that we don’t choose the story of the past but do choose how we tell it forward, opening space for students from 35 faith traditions to find Lutheran institutions to be their home.
-
Article
The Face of the Neighbor: An Interview with Four Capital University Faculty About Their Recent Visit to Cuba
Brian Forry Wallace, Michael Yosha, Reg Dyck, Susan Narita
No. 7 · Summer 1999
Four Capital University faculty—political scientist Brian Wallace (returning to Cuba a third time after the 1994 boat lift), English professor Reg Dyck, ESL teacher Susan Narita, and political scientist Michael Yosha—recount their summer 1998 trip with Pastors for Peace, describing Cuban priorities of education, health care, and military (in that order), the cultural richness of Havana from sixteenth-century cloisters to Miramar, the Cuban Foreign Service’s vision of a Scandinavian-style democratic socialism, the counter-productive U.S. embargo (including its effect on kidney dialysis machines), Castro’s 1991 reconciliation with religious communities, and a recurrent image of a little girl named Marguerite singing at a school for amputee and terminally ill children. The interview was conducted by Capital senior Jessica Brown and Tom Christenson.
-
Article
Reclaiming Grundtvig at Grand View College
Mark C. Mattes
No. 27 · Spring 2008
Mattes traces the Grundtvigian heritage of Grand View College — the only North American institution founded by Grundtvigian Danes — from its origins in the 1880s split between Pietist Inner Mission and Grundtvigian Danish Lutherans through its golden years of folk dancing, gymnastics, and the weekly lecture, to the demographic and curricular changes of the 1950s through 1990s. He describes recent tangible initiatives, including the Grand View College Reader, Imaging the Journey, and the 2007 Strategic Planning Commission’s “Faith Foundations” statement, that seek to recover the “Human first, then Christian” mantra of Grand View’s ancestors for a generation of students whose “ship” has had not only its planks but its very model replaced.
-
Article
Lutheran Higher Education and the Public Intellectual
Ernest L. Simmons
No. 26 · Fall 2007
Simmons argues that college faculty and administrators are, like it or not, public intellectuals, and that Lutheran higher education’s dialectical understanding of Christ and culture is well suited to support four functions of the public intellectual: articulating constructive critique of received social explanation (especially the “collage identity” described by Renate Schacht); presenting a transcendent theological perspective through the theology of the cross that takes seriously God’s hiddeness, the presence of ambiguity, and the reality of suffering; pursuing the common good amid the demise of the “commons” through H. Richard Niebuhr’s “Christ and Culture in Paradox”; and educating for citizenship through Christian vocation by connecting the practical and existential dimensions of the question “Why are you here?”
-
Article
Forming the Division for Access, Equity & Belonging at Susquehanna University
Amy Davis, Dena Salerno, María L. O. Muñoz, Nina Mandel, Scott Kershner
No. 59 · Spring 2024
Five Susquehanna University colleagues trace the institution’s 166-year arc from a Missionary Institute founded to remove barriers to education through the formation of a new Division for Access, Equity & Belonging in 2023, arguing that access rooted in Lutheran origins must continue to drive policy revision, infrastructure, and belonging for minoritized communities today.
-
Article
Where Disruption and Vocation Meet: One Path Toward Teaching Reproductive Justice in Challenging Times
Lena R. Hann
No. 57 · Spring 2023
Hann recounts how a missed math class in her first college term led her into volunteer work at a feminist abortion clinic and ultimately a career in public health, and describes how she designed and taught a Reproductive Justice immersive term course at Augustana College through the disruptions of COVID-19, George Floyd’s murder, and the Dobbs decision.
-
Article
Students in the Cloud: Creating Digital Citizens
Jose Marichal
No. 29 · Spring 2009
Marichal weighs the utopian and dystopian views of the “networked information economy,” drawing on Yochai Benkler, Manuel Castells, Henry Jenkins, Cass Sunstein, Robert Putnam, Nicholas Carr, and Andrew Keen to chart the promise and peril of life “in the cloud,” and proposes Aristotle’s intellectual virtue of phronesis—developed through Hubert Dreyfus’s five stages of skill acquisition—as the goal of digital citizenship for college faculty and their students.